The BikeLoud Lawsuit: What Portland's Fight Over the Bicycle Bill Means for Medford

In Portland, a small nonprofit called BikeLoud PDX has been fighting in court since 2022 to force the city to follow a law that's been on the books for over 50 years. The law is ORS 366.514, better known as the Oregon Bicycle Bill. And while the lawsuit is about Portland, the legal principles at stake have consequences for every city within the state of Oregon. For more background on this bill, see our post concerning southern Oregon's forgotten legacy.

What Is the BikeLoud Lawsuit?

In November 2022, BikeLoud PDX filed a lawsuit against the City of Portland, alleging that Portland's Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) had systematically failed to comply with the Bicycle Bill. Fifteen Portland residents signed on as plaintiffs.

Their argument was straightforward: the Bicycle Bill requires cities to include bicycle and pedestrian facilities whenever a road is "constructed, reconstructed, or relocated." Portland had been repaving streets across the city for years without adding the bike infrastructure the law requires.

The city tried to get the case dismissed. A judge initially granted the dismissal in May 2023, but left the door open for BikeLoud to refile. They did, and in December 2023, a judge ruled the lawsuit could move forward. That was a landmark moment. For the first time, a court acknowledged that a city could be held accountable for ignoring the Bike Bill.

The Settlement That Almost Was

After years of litigation, BikeLoud and the City of Portland's attorneys negotiated a $6 million settlement. The deal included $3 million for safe routes to schools, bike lanes on Northeast Sandy Boulevard, bus and bike lanes on 82nd Avenue, and a commitment that the city would follow the Bike Bill going forward.

It was expected to be a rubber stamp. The city attorney had negotiated it. PBOT leadership had signed off.

Then, in October 2025, Portland's City Council rejected the settlement. Councilor Sameer Kanal said council members felt they hadn't been consulted before the terms were finalized: "The City Council is not a rubber stamp."

Without council approval, the settlement fell through, and the case appears headed to trial.

Why This Matters for Medford

The Bicycle Bill doesn't only apply to Portland. It applies to every city in Oregon. The law says that when a road is reconstructed, bicycle and pedestrian facilities must be included.

Medford is currently planning to spend over a million dollars to reconfigure Main Street, removing a protected two-way bike lane and replacing it with sharrows. That's not maintenance, it's reconstruction. And the result is less bike infrastructure than what exists today.

The BikeLoud lawsuit established that the Bicycle Bill is not just aspirational language, but an enforceable legal obligation. A judge in Multnomah County has already ruled that citizens can sue their city for failing to comply. If that principle holds (whether through settlement or trial), it sets a precedent that any Oregon city stripping bike infrastructure during a road project could face legal consequences.

The Broader Pattern

What's happening in Portland applies to Medford. Under Oregon law, cities are committed to building safer, more accessible streets. Now some of those same cities are being swayed by loud and opinionated voices that are encouraging the city to actually run afoul of Oregon law.

In Portland, the city repaved streets and skipped the bike lanes. In Medford, the city is actively removing a bike lane that already exists. Both may violate the same 55-year-old law.

As we covered in our post on the Bicycle Bill's southern Oregon roots, this law was inspired by Jacksonville legislator Don Stathos, who was nearly run off the road while riding to Medford. Medford is now working against the very law his experience helped create.

What Comes Next

The BikeLoud case might technically be unresolved. However, if it goes to trial and BikeLoud wins, it would create clear legal precedent that Oregon cities cannot ignore the Bicycle Bill when they reconstruct roads. That precedent would apply statewide.

Even without a final ruling, the lawsuit has already changed the conversation. It has shown that the Bicycle Bill has teeth, that citizens can enforce it, and that cities can't just treat bike infrastructure as optional.

Medford's council still has time to reconsider the Main Street reversion before it begins. The legal landscape is shifting, and the question is not just whether the reversion is good policy, but whether it's legal.

Take Action